Tam Farrow erased from a photo with Mia Farrow and Hillary Clinton
Tam Farrow, who killed herself when she was 21 years old, was erased from a picture with Hillary Clinton, Mia Farrow, Ronan Farrow, Dylan Farrow

7/20 W. Allen wasn’t in Therapy with a Child Psychologist

Woody Allen has never been in therapy with a child psychologist for his conduct toward Dylan Farrow. Both Satchel (Ronan) and Dylan were.

Woody Allen has never been in therapy with a child psychologist for his conduct toward Dylan Farrow.
Woody Allen has never been in therapy with a child psychologist for his conduct toward Dylan Farrow.

Woody Allen has never been in therapy with a child psychologist

One of Maureen Orth’s (Vanity Fair) and Farrow clan biggest lie is that “Woody Allen had been in therapy for alleged inappropriate behavior toward Dylan with a child psychologist before the abuse allegation was presented to the authorities or made public.

Maureen Orth adds: “Mia Farrow had instructed her babysitters that Allen was never to be left alone with Dylan.” then jump to the fact 3. Of course, people make the link between Woody Allen being in therapy with a child psychologist before the abuse allegation (false) and Mia Farrow who had instructed her babysitters that Allen was never to be left alone with Dylan (true, as seen previously).

FALSE: Woody Allen had been in therapy for alleged inappropriate behavior toward Dylan with a child psychologist before the abuse allegation was presented to the authorities or made public.”

Both Satchel (now Ronan) and Dylan were treated by two psychologists: Dr. Susan  Coates, a  clinical  psychologist  who treated Satchel; Dr. Nancy Schultz, a clinical psychologist who treated DylanAs written in the Supreme Court document, both psychologists expressed the opinion that they didn’t believe that Woody Allen sexually abused Dylan.

According to the Supreme Court document:

In June 1990, the parties became concerned with Satchel’s (Ronan Farrow) behavior and took him to see Dr. Coates, with whom he then began treatment. At Dr. Coates’ request, both parents participated in Satchel’s treatment. In the fall of 1990, the parties asked Dr. Coates to evaluate Dylan to determine if she needed therapy. During the course of the evaluation, Ms. Farrow expressed her concern to Dr. Coates that Mr. Allen’s behavior with Dylan was not appropriate. Dr. Coates observed:

‘I understood why she was worried, because it [Mr. Allen’s relationship with Dylan] was intense, … I did not see it as sexual, but I saw it as inappropriately intense because it excluded everybody else, and it placed a demand on a child for a kind of acknowledgment that I felt should not be placed on a child …’

She testified that she worked with Mr. Allen to help him to understand that his behavior with Dylan was inappropriate and that it had to be modified. Dr. Coates also recommended that Dylan enter therapy with Dr. Schultz, with whom Dylan began treatment in April 1991.

The facts are very far from Maureen Orth’s lies, intended to make people believe that Woody Allen was paying his own psychoanalyst because he was sexually attracted to DylanNone the Dr. Coates and none the Dr. Schultz were Allen’s therapist, so Allen was not in therapy for inappropriate behavior with Dylan. Furthermore, Dr. Coates’ statement is very clear: “I did not see it as sexual, but I saw it as inappropriately intense because it excluded everybody else, and it placed a demand on a child for a kind of acknowledgment that I felt should not be placed on a child”.

Any kind of Allen sex therapist story is a complete lie.

TRUE “Mia Farrow had instructed her babysitters that Allen was never to be left alone with Dylan.”

On January 13, 1992, Mia Farrow discovers nude photographs of his 19/21 years old adoptive daughter, Soon-Yi Previn in Woody Allen’s apartment.

On her memoir, Mia Farrow writes:

“After January 13, I didn’t leave him alone with any of my kids.”

Mia Farrow. A Memoir. What Falls Away – Page 283

Mia Farrow confirmed in his memoir that she wanted to use Woody’s relationship with Soon-Yi who was between 19 and 21 years old, as an evidence that Woody Allen could sexually abuse a 7 years old child:

Now I viewed his [Woody Allen] behavior with Dylan in a complete different light. I no longer believed he could control himself. I no longer believed he was dealing with his problems responsibly. I was no longer sure that his “inappropriate” and “intense” behavior with Dylan was not sexual. At exactly what point does it become child abuse?

RELATED CONTENT. Mia Farrow used Soon-Yi to accuse Woody Allen.

Mia Farrow. A Memoir. What Falls Away – Page 281

Full article: Mia Farrow used Allen’s relationship with Soon-Yi for Dylan sexual abuse.

According to Nanny Monica Thompson (see 9.) :

“Ms. Farrow set the stage to report the incident involving Dylan. For several weeks, Ms. Farrow insisted that Mr. Allen not be left alone with Dylan and wanted me to be with them at all times.”

Next and Previous facts

Soon-Yi Previn wasn’t Allen’s daughter and when she was a child he never was a paternal figure for her.

When Soon-Yi Previn was a child, Woody Allen wasn't a parental figure for her.
When Soon-Yi Previn was a child, Woody Allen wasn’t a parental figure for her.

When Woody Allen officially adopted Moses Farrow and Dylan Farrow in December 1991, Mia Farrow filled an affidavit praising his parenting skills.

Few months before the allegation, Mia Farrow filled an affidavit praising Woody Allen's parenting skills.
Few months before the allegation, Mia Farrow filled an affidavit praising Woody Allen’s parenting skills.

Read all the facts

This post is an excerpt from Woody Allen Sex Abuse Allegation: 20 Undeniable Facts. Read all the facts now.

Woody Allen : 20 undeniable facts about the sexual abuse allegation
Woody Allen : 20 undeniable facts about the sexual abuse allegation

2 Comments on “7/20 W. Allen wasn’t in Therapy with a Child Psychologist”

  1. I’m rather baffled as to why Woody doesn’t pursue legal action against both for slander. I would think he has grounds considering he was cleared by two investigative bodies, was never charged, took and passed a lie detector test, etc. If it were me I would pursue it.

    I don’t understand why so many people seem to believe this story. To me it’s so obvious that Dylan is recalling what was implanted in her mind and Mia did this for vengeance. Don’t get me wrong; I think Woody Allen is a creep for taking up with Soon-Yi. But I find it odd that no one points out that Mia has been guilty of nearly everything we find Woody creepy for. She broke up a marriage between Dorrie and Andre Previn, and what’s worse, Dorrie was a dear friend of hers. She married a man 30+ years older than her. Why she now finds those actions abhorrent seems pretty hypocritical.

    I don’t buy that he abused Dylan. A man doesn’t suddenly become a child molester at 57 and then never do it again or before. Dylan’s story has changed many times. And the way they’ve used the Me Too movement to relaunch this is just disturbing.

    1. Not sure why you think Woody Allen is a creep for taking up with Soon-Yi: his relationship with Mia Farrow was over since many years, she now says that Woody Allen’s son, Ronan, is Sinatra’s son (still, the probability he’s really Sinatra son is very weak) and Soon-Yi has reported abuses by Mia Farrow. Woody and Soon-Yi are together since 29 years and have adopted 2 daughters who are now 2 young and happy adults (excepted the lies about their father) and this thanks to Woody Allen “taking up with Soon-Yi”. But anyway, thank you very much for your comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *