Maureen Orth’s article in Vanity Fair, “10 Undeniable Facts About The Woody Allen Sexual-Abuse Allegation” is complete bunk. It is a distorted exercise of full-on mendaciousness from beginning to end.
The facts are either flat-out-false, entirely deniable, or misleading and irrelevant
The facts Maureen Orth cites as “undeniable” are either flat-out false, entirely deniable, or misleading and irrelevant due to the fact that Orth purposely omits other, more important facts that cast doubt on the allegations.
Some of these “facts” have been used many times by Dylan Farrow: Dylan Farrow: 8 lies in 9 paragraphs.
Fact-checkers didn’t Want Allow the Piece to be Published
According to Maureen Orth herself:
I remember, for the legal fact-checking process on the Woody Allen piece, I was in a room with the fact-checkers for eight hours. They weren’t going to allow the piece to be published until I had a written letter from Mia Farrow saying if we did get sued, she would be a witness to say what I had said was the truth from her point of view.
Maureen’s Orth 10 Undeniable Facts
Read Maureen’s Orth “10 Undeniable Facts About The Woody Allen Sexual-Abuse Allegation.
RELATIVE CONTENT. The Truth about the Ten “Undeniable Facts”.
Video – About Maureen’t Orth 10 Undeniable Facts
The video will begin at 20:24, with Maureen Orth admitting she passed height hours with the fact-checkers and that they weren’t going to allow the piece to be published until she had a written letter from Mia Farrow saying if they get sued, she would be a witness to say what she said was the truth from her point of view.
Woody Allen – 20 Undeniable Facts
Facts and sources matter. And Allen sex abuse allegation doesn’t resists to facts. Far from Maureen Orth’s lies for Vanity Fair, Woody Allen Sex Abuse Allegation: 20 Undeniable Facts supports Woody Allen’s innocence.
7 Comments on “Woody Allen – Vanity Fair 10 Undeniable Facts”
Are you going to add a second doc on episodes 3 & 4?.
Would be interesting coming from. you!.
Sorry, but not sure what you mean by “Are you going to add a second doc on episodes 3 & 4.” What episodes?
Episodes 3 & 4 Allen vs Farrow. As you did fo 1 & 2.
Sorry, but WAML didn’t watch Allen v. Farrow, so I think there is a kind of confusion: could you give us a link ?
I thought you were the author of this analysis?
No, not at all: WAML and The Woody Problem are different.