Everyday, lies and gossips about Woody Allen are spreading media and social networks. It seems many people lie on purpose to slander him.
Is Khadijah White really “Prof at Rudgers” ?
According to her Twitter profile, Khakihah White is a teacher at Rudgers University.
If true, she’s ready to teach to her student that in USA you can marry your own daughter:
He married his daughter
— Khadijah White (@khadastrophic) June 14, 2020
Khadijah White is also multiplying lies to slander Woody Allen:
They were not adults when they met. She was his romantic partner’s child who he helped raise alongside his biological children. The sister of his biological son. A child. He was raising. They announced their relationship when she was 17 or 18. It’s disgusting.
— Khadijah White (@khadastrophic) June 14, 2020
Woody Allen and Mia Farrow never lived together, Woody Allen didn’t help Mia Farrow to raise Soon-Yi Previn.
Woody Allen didn’t have biological children, only one child, Satchel/Ronan Farrow, born on December 1987, when Soon-Yi Previn was already 17 years old.
Soon-Yi Previn and Woody Allen relationship began when Soon-Yi was 21 years old, not 17 or 18. “Until 1990, although he had had little contact with any of the Previn children, Mr. Allen had the least to do with Soon-Yi.” – Justice Wilk, Supreme Court
Both Soon-Yi Previn, Justice Wilk and Mia Farrow agree that Woody Allen wasn’t a paternal figure for Soon-Yi Previn when she was a child.
Medias whereKhadijah White has or will spread her lies:
“She has written for The Atlantic, The New York Times, The Root, Huffington Post, BBC, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Los Angeles Times, Quartz, Gizmodo, and Buzzfeed.” – Source: Oxford University Press
Anna Fearon on Twitter
Trump is POTUS. Clinton is having a lovely retirement. Maxwell is hiding. Woody Allen evaded justice. Prince Andrew has dodged the FBI’s questioning. All these people knew what Epstein was doing & some participated.
Money & status allows you to get away with it. 🤬#FilthyRich
— Anna Fearon 🚺✊ (@anna_fearon) May 29, 2020
If somebody evaded justice, it’s Anna Fearon. Woody Allen was investigated for months by two teams of experts on sexual abuse and cleared two times.
Micha Frazer-Carroll on Twitter
Content note: CSA
Imagine not acknowledging the dossier of women’s testimony against woody allen:— Micha Frazer-Carroll (@Micha_Frazer) May 29, 2020
There is zero women’s testimony against Woody Allen. Only Dylan Farrow’s allegation, found no credible by two independent teams of experts on sexual abuse (Connecticut, New York).
Nicola Coughlan on Twitter
Maureen Orth’s article in Vanity Fair, “10 Undeniable Facts About The Woody Allen Sexual-Abuse Allegation” is complete bunk. It is a distorted exercise of full-on mendaciousness from beginning to end.
How some people can still help to spread them in 2020, speak volume about these people.
10 Undeniable Facts About the Woody Allen Sexual-Abuse Allegation https://t.co/LcCvA4r9AI
— Nicola Coughlan (@nicolacoughlan) May 29, 2020
Moya Lothian-Mclean on Twitter
Moya Lothian-Mclean wasn’t happy with Hardley Freeman article for The Guardian: the article is about facts clearing Woody Allen and for personal reasons, she needs the great director guilty.
Love to claim trans women are a sexual assault risk and then publish an exclusive interview with Woody Allen, that dismisses all allegations against him and rubbishes anybody who thinks his decades of predatory behaviour might be worth attention. pic.twitter.com/cmTcvroieu
— Moya Lothian-Mclean (@mlothianmclean) May 29, 2020
“… decades of predatory behaviour.” ? This is a huge lie: except Dylan Farrow, one time nobody has ever complaint about Woody Allen, who was right to say he should be the poster boy for the MeToo movement:
But you know I, I should be the poster boy for the #MeToo movement. Because I have worked in movies for 50 years. I’ve worked with hundreds of actresses and not a single one – big ones, famous ones, ones starting out – have ever, ever suggested any kind of impropriety at all. I’ve always had a wonderful record with them. – Woody Allen, The Guardian
But as you can check below, Moya Lothian-Mclean has some serious sources !
no, do your own Googling, I’m not here to indulge bad faith enquiries (it’s not a ‘genuine question’, is it Mike?) when there are scores of women who’ve talked about Woody Allen’s predatory behaviour. You either believe them or you don’t. Have a nice day.
— Moya Lothian-Mclean (@mlothianmclean) May 29, 2020
Fiona Sturges for The Guardian
A review about “Apropos of Something” for The Guardian.
“…his revelation that ‘we couldn’t keep our hands of each other’ is, frankly, too much information when discussing a woman who was, to all intents and purposes, his stepdaughter.”
Woody Allen and Mia Farrow were never married and never lived together.
When she was a child, Woody Allen was never a paternal figure for Sooy-Yi Previn, as confirmed both by Soon-Yi Previn, Justice Wilk (Supreme Court) and Mia Farrow.
For my sake, @FionaSturges felt some urgent NEED to portray their relationship as morally dubious, even incestuous, in her piece.
Even if that took some morally dubious twisting of the facts, and a hardly veiled intentional ambiguity of words.
For a journalist, that’s shameful.
— Else Verwoerd (@elseverwoerd) May 23, 2020
Rachel Cooke for The Guardian
A no review about “Apropos of Something” for The Guardian.
“The book is dedicated to Soon-Yi, the stepdaughter he seduced…”
Stepdaughter ? Woody Allen and Mia Farrow were never married and never lived together.
When she was a child, Woody Allen was never a paternal figure for Sooy-Yi Previn, as confirmed both by Soon-Yi Previn, Justice Wilk (Supreme Court) and Mia Farrow.
Did Rachel Cooke even read the book ? Or does she lies on purpose ?
Many people contacted Rachel Cooke on Twitter, asking for a correction. She didn’t answer and didn’t correct her text and it seems that The Guardian is protecting her.
It is clear that @MsRachelCooke has no intention of correcting her factual and damaging mistake. That is telling of her conscience and credibility.
Now it has become clear that also the @Guardian is protecting her mistake. They never responded to several critics I have heard of.
— Else Verwoerd (@elseverwoerd) May 23, 2020
Meanwhile, at the end of the article, The Guardian is asking for support:
News is under threat …
… just when we need it the most. Millions of readers around the world are flocking to the Guardian in search of honest, authoritative, fact-based reporting that can help them understand the biggest challenge we have faced in our lifetime.
… “fact-based reporting” ? Really ?
